It
all started with a Mad Men episode. It was the episode in Season 5
where a client wants a Beatles song for their ad, and Don explains that The
Beatles would be too expensive, but that they’d find something similar, assuring the client he knew what The Beatles sounded like.
Of course a theme of the episode is the speed at which everything in
the world is changing, and so it ends with Megan playing Don a song off of The
Beatles new album, which is vastly different than the music Don is familiar
with. That album was Revolver (quickly identified by Mrs. – we’ll get to
this in a bit), and the track was "Tomorrow Never
Knows". Don’s reaction to hearing this song (that to him sounds nothing
like The Beatles he knows) is to turn off the album and go to bed. I had a
different reaction. I kind of liked the song and was suddenly intrigued.
I
should confess something at this point – I never really liked The
Beatles. To the age-old question of The Beatles or The Stones, I went
with the latter. And it wasn't that I was a fan of The Rolling Stones (I like
a handful of songs, but nothing more), but more my opinion that The Beatles were
an overrated pop act. Greatest band ever? Really? I mean, I
understood why people liked their music. It was easy to sing along to and
it had the historical influence and well, it was vanilla and accessible, which
is what I think most people want. And there were even a couple of Beatles songs I
really liked ("In My Life" comes to mind).
And I even briefly had a thing for John Lennon’s music. But
not the "Fab Four" in their suits on The Ed Sullivan Show. That wasn’t for
me. I was cooler than that. But what
I realize now is that what I considered to be The Beatles really amounted to
just their first 4 albums (I’ll call it their pop stage). I identified
them with songs like "Love Me Do", "I Want To Hold Your Hand", "Twist And Shout", and "Can’t Buy Me Love". Perfectly fine songs,
but nothing special for me. Certainly
nothing to make me want to listen to more.
But then I found myself listening to the opening of "Tomorrow Never Knows".
So
back to that Mad Men episode. As Don was turning off the record and the
credits were rolling, I realized I wanted to hear more of that song. So with the power of i-Tunes I not only
listened to that song (again and again), but quickly previewed all of the songs
off Revolver (it turned out Mrs. actually owned this album, so I could then listen to it in it's entirety). And I came to a
realization – I might actually like this. And then I realized something
much worse. I might be wrong about The Beatles. They might be
pretty good. In fact, perhaps great. Because I’m me and when I obsess I obsess completely, over the next several weeks I worked my way through listening to
sections of all of their albums (again thanks to i-Tunes) and devouring information
on The Beatles. I was ensnared in the
web. Now Mrs., who calls me a music
snob, wondered why I never just listened to all of their music many years
ago. But without the magic of i-Tunes or
access to any of their albums as a teen, there was really no way for me to do
this. Again, I considered them a pop act
and I was a grunge loving high-schooler.
I had dismissed them and was stubborn about changing that view (hence the music snob moniker).
I’ll
pause here to say that Mrs. doesn’t really have a love of music. I mean,
sure she likes music, but she doesn’t have any real obsession for bands like I
do (all healthy obsessions of course). She uses music as more of a
distraction in the car or during work around the house (like painting), or of course
Christmas music during the holiday season. But The Beatles were one of
the bands she claimed as a favorite. So now that I found myself slowly
coming to appreciate the musical genius of the band, I figured she’d appreciate
that we’d finally have some musical interest in common (our interests here
diverge much like with regards to movies and books). So what happens when I unveil my newfound
love of The Beatles to her? Well of
course she got mad. Maybe mad is the wrong word, but
she did accuse me of listening to them just because I didn’t want her to have
musical knowledge that I didn’t possess.
The Beatles were her thing not mine.
Now this is not why I started
listening to The Beatles. I’ll fully admit
Mrs. is a bigger Beatles fan than me. Hey, she
was the one who pointed out to me that the song on Mad Men was from Revolver
(mentioned above), so clearly she knew her stuff. She sings along to the songs (and even gets
some of the lyrics right), and knows the difference between the early albums and
the later albums. And none of that
bothers me. I think she should just be
happy that we can now listen to The Beatles in the car on long drives and both finally
agree on the music. But I digress.
So
back to The Beatles. I’m not going to
pretend they're suddenly my favorite band, because they’re not. I’d still skip most of their earlier “pop” albums. But I do appreciate that
even those first albums were influential in music history and planted the seeds
for what came later. Kind of like an
author’s first book (assuming said author isn’t Harper Lee). An artist needs to find his/her/their voice. What I find incredible though is the complete
turnaround my view of the band has undergone.
They may not be my favorite, but the more I listen, the more I enjoy
what they produced. And the more I
realize how much more diverse and innovative their music was from my earlier opinion. And I’m certainly not going to argue with
someone who says they’re the greatest band ever. Because they just might
be. A few examples of what I find
amazing about the band:
They
were a band for such a short time relatively speaking. Their 12 studio albums were all released
between 1963-1970. The Rolling Stones by
way of comparison released 29 albums between 1964-2005 and are still touring
(or whatever the geriatric equivalent is).
Heck, U2 has been releasing albums and touring since 1980 (over 30
years!) and even Pearl Jam has been rocking since 1991 (god I’m old). The Beatles were a flash in the pan
comparatively.
Despite
their short run they produced more classic songs than any other band ever. I mean even a non-Beatles fan like I was
could list, and even sing along to, dozens of songs. They did all of this in 8 years! The released multiple albums in a single year 4
separate times. They never went a year
between albums during their whole existence.
That’s beyond prolific.
After
the early pop phase, they changed up their music and experimented with so many
different sounds and styles that all of their albums are distinct. This is the key thing that I was
missing. I thought of them as that pop
act and couldn’t get past it. But they
were so much more, for lack of a better word, alternative, which is exactly the
type of music I love. And it’s these
more experimental albums that caught my attention. And not to keep repeating myself, but they
evolved as musicians year after year after year. Song bands work on albums for years and still
end up sounding the same as the previous album.
Not so with Lennon, McCartney, Harrison, and Starr.
So
let’s end with the album Revolver. After listening to almost everything
the band produced, I can say without question that Revolver is their best album. I would
probably rank the top 3 (and you know I love ranking) as Revolver, Rubber Soul,
and Magical Mystery Tour. But Revolver is far and away my favorite. I’d go
as far as saying it’s a top ten album for me (maybe a ranking for a different
time). So it might have taken me too
long to come around on The Beatles, but better late than never when it comes to
appreciating them as artists and adding their music to my rotation. In
this instance I admit I was wrong. There’s a first time for everything.
2 comments:
Beatles suck. Never understood them. Some ok songs when they were all hopped up on drugs.
Oh snap! I think you guys might have to spend some time debating this over Thanksgiving.
Post a Comment